Educational communities of rural schools in the arctic (on the example of the Murmansk oblast): A social justice perspective on inclusion

The article addresses the current problem of searching and substantiating mechanisms for the development of inclusive education. The research relevance is also determined by the Arctic context, which corresponds to the epistemological need of modern interdisciplinary knowledge in the development of inclusive education, the priorities of state policy, as well as to the expectations and demands of regional communities. The authors aim to study social interactions within rural schools in the Arctic from the standpoint of inclusion as an indicator of social justice (on the example of the Murmansk Oblast). To that end, rural schools are modelled and described based on the developed criteria. Difficulties experienced by the teachers in the course of inclusive educational process, including when using distance technologies, are typified. According to the results obtained, typical models of rural schools in the Murmansk Oblast include suburban schools and remote schools and their following variants: the school as a territorial cooperation, a border school, an isolated school, and an indigenous school. In all rural school models, under successful formation of external and internal social ties, a  shortage of special education teachers is observed. The  teachers face methodological, organizational, and social difficulties. In addition, the educational environment is not sufficiently accessible, which forms barriers to social justice. The revealed regional specificity of rural schools serves as a justification for a conceptual and substantive development of Arctic pedagogy. The results obtained are useful for further theoretical and empirical research in the field of inclusive education, as well as for the development of regional programs of inclusive educational practices, taking the differentiation of social conditions into account. 

1. Afon’kina Yu.A. Inclusive landscape of social environments of modern Russian society in the context of independent life of people with disabilities [dissertation]Murmansk; 2022. (In Russ.).

2. Afon’kina Yu.A. Family of a child with disabilities in a modern arctic city. Social policy and sociology. 2024;23(2):15–21. (In Russ.).

3. Afonkina Yu.A. Lifestyle of Children with Disabilities in a Modern Arctic City. Russia: Society, Politics, History. 2024;(1(10)):70–90. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2024-1(10)-70-90

4. Belonozhko L.N. Features of social health of the population in the Arctic region. Proceedings from Higher Educational Institutions Sociology Economics Politics. 2021;14(3):24–44. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2021-3-24-44

5. Vygotskii L.S. Collected Works. Vol. 3. Problems of Psychic Development. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ.; 1983. (In Russ.).

6. Gorshkov M.K. Social justice and inequalities as an object of sociological diagnostics. Russia in Reform: Year-Book. Issue 21. Moscow: 2023, p. 150–172. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2023.6

7. Gudkov A.B., Degteva G.N., Shepeleva O.A. Ecological and hygienic problems in the Arctic territories of intensive industrial activity (review). Public Health. 2021;1(4):49–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21045/2782-1676-2021-1-4-49-55

8. Davidenko V., Kolchinskya E., Yakovleva P. Availability of education for the small indigenous peoples of the North. Educational Policy. 2022;(3(91)):34–48. (In Russ.).

9. Denisova O., Lekhanova O. Designing the inclusive policy of the university: the experience of the federal resource center for higher education. In: Education of individuals with special educational needs: methodology, theory, practice: Proc. of the International scientific and practical conf. Minsk, 6 Okt. 2022. Minsk; 2022, p. 73–77. (In Russ.).

10. Kantor V.Z., Proekt Y.L., Kosheleva A.N., Lugovaya V.F., Khoroshikh V.V. Inclusive dispositions as a professionally significant feature in pre-service teachers: A typological focus. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2023;(210):217–229. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2023-210-217-229

11. Kobrina L.M., Kosinova E.P. On the issue of integrated education and upbringing of children with disabilities in the conditions of schools in the Far North. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2011;3(3):94–107. (In Russ.).

12. Korobeinikov I.A., Kuzmicheva T.V. Development of Professional Competences of teachers and Psychologists in the Conditions of Joint training. Higher Education in Russia. 2019;28(6):97–106. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-6-97-106

13. Kuz’micheva T.V. An integrative approach to training teachers and psychologists to work with primary school students with developmental delays in the context of inclusive education [dissertation]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).

14. Kuzmicheva T., Afonkina Y., Morozova D. Psychological and pedagogical assessment of individualization of the educational environment in the context of inclusive education. Krasnoyarsk: Scientific and Innovation Center; 2021. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12731/978-5-907208-80-3

15. Kuzmicheva T.V. Addressing a teacher’s request to psychologist regarding a primary school child with mental retardation using interdisciplinary monitoring of the child’s psychosocial development. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2024;(211):140– 149. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2024-211-140-149

16. Kukushkina O.I., Goncharova E.L., Malofeev N. Inclusive education: the view of defectologists of the Russian scientific school. Almanac Institute of Special Education. 2023;(52):34–42. (In Russ.).

17. Lazurenko S.B., Solov’eva T.A., Filatova Yu.O. Results of the discussion of the current state of theory and practice of Russian education of children with special educational needs: information and analytical review of the II All-Russian scientific and practical conference «Inclusion of the 21st century». Defectology. 2023;(5):74–79. (In Russ.).

18. Malysheva E.V., Nabok I.L. Education of indigenous peoples of the Arctic: problems and development prospects. Society. Environment. Development. 2015;(1):139–144. (In Russ.).

19. Marfusalova V.P., Sakerdonova A.S. The Role of Educational Institutions in Preservation and Development of Languages and Cultures of Indigenous Peoples of the Arctic. Vestnik of NorthEastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2017;(1):38–43. (In Russ.).

20. Nikolaeva A.D. Education in nomadic conditions (academic review). Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2021;(2):5–13. (In Russ.).

21. Pozharskaya V.V. Some factors of affecting the incidence of cold diseases in children (10– 18 years old) living in the Murmansk region. Proceedings of the Kola Science Center. Series: Natural Sciences and Humanities. 2024;3(1):170–178. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.37614/2949-1185.2024.3.1.020

22. Provorova A.A., Smirennikova E.V., Ukhanova A.V. Population Health in the Russian Arctic: Problems, Challenges, Solutions. Arctic and North. 2024;(55):161–181. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2024.55.161

23. Alekhina S.V., Samsonova E.V., eds. Creating an inclusive educational environment in educational organizations: methodological recommendations for management and teaching staff of general education organizations. Moscow: MGPPU; 2022. (In Russ.).

24. Solov’eva T.A. A systematic approach to organizing the process of including primary school students with disabilities into the general educational environment. Moscow: MPGU; 2018. (In Russ.).

25. Starovoit N.V. Inclusive culture of an educational organization: approaches to understanding and formation. Koncept [internet]. 2016;8:31–35. (In Russ.). Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/56117.htm

26. Sheveleva D.E. The concepts of “inclusive culture”, “inclusive pedagogy” and “inclusive didactics” in modern pedagogy and school practice. Pedagogic Correction Education Journal. 2023;(2):5–18. (In Russ.).

27. Ben-Peretz M., Flores M.A. Tensions and paradoxes in teaching: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2018;41(2):202–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1431216

28. Dukuzumuremyi S., Siklander P. Interactions between pupils and their teacher in collaborative and technology-enhanced learning settings in the inclusive classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018;76:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.010

29. Forlin Ñ., John Lian M.G. Reform, Inclusion and Teacher Education: towards a new era of special education in Asia-Pacific regions. Hong-Kong; 2008. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895313

30. Goe L., Croft A., Reschly D.J. Challenges in Evaluating Special Education Teachers and English Language Learner Specialists. USA: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality; 2010.

31. Jensen E., Ncube S. Peer-collaboration: An effective teaching strategy for inclusive classrooms. The Journal of International Association of Special Education. 2011;12(1):79–81.

32. Jensen E. Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2005.

33. Kesalaht E., Uayrynen S. Learning from Our Neighbours: Inclusive Education in the Making [internet]. Rovaniemi; 2013. Avaialble at: https://lauda.ulapland.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/59480/Learning%20from%20Our%20Neighbours%20-%20Inclusive%20Education%20in%20the%20Making.pdf9sequence=4

34. Poon-McBrayer K.F. To integrate or not to integrate: Systemic dilemmas in Hong Kong. The Journal of Special Education. 2004;37(4):249–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690403 70040401

35. Väyrynen S., Kesälahti E., Pynninen T., Siivola J., Flotskaya N., Bulanova S., Volskaya O., Usova Z., Kuzmicheva T., Afonkina Y. Finnish and Russian teachers supporting the development of social skills. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2016;39(4):437–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1216543